Google+
  • Ocwen2.66+0.04 +1.53%
  • Zillow43.34+0.11 +0.25%
  • Trulia47+0 +0%
  • NationStar17.00-0.07 -0.41%
  • CoreLogic42.64-1.08 -2.47%
  • RE/MAX55.20+0.90 +1.66%
  • Fannie Mae2.60+0.00 +0.00%
  • Freddie Mac2.50+0.02 +0.81%
  • Wells Fargo52.41-0.37 -0.70%
  • CitiMortgage62.07+0.12 +0.19%
  • Bank of America23.24-0.01 -0.04%
  • Fidelity National Financial42.42+0.57 +1.36%
  • First American43.10-0.17 -0.39%
  • Black Knight Financial Services39.45-0.30 -0.75%
  • AUDUSD=X0.7445-0.0010 -0.1328%
  • USDJPY=X111.3100-0.4920 -0.4401%
Home | Daily Dose | MERS Emerges Triumphant
Print This Post Print This Post

MERS Emerges Triumphant

gavel-threeThe legal right of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) to act as mortgagee has been repeatedly challenged in the last few years, and MERS has repeatedly emerged victorious in court.

The latest court decision in favor of MERS came this week from the New Hampshire State Supreme Court, which upheld a July 2015 decision that the language in a mortgage granted to MERS as the mortgagee as nominee for the lender and the lenders successors, and assigns evidences an agency relationship between the note holder and the assignee of a MERS mortgage, according to an announcement from MERSCORP Holdings, Inc.

The borrower in the case of Castagnaro v. Bank of New York Mellon filed a wrongful foreclosure action, claiming that BNY Mellon lacked the authority to foreclosure non-judicially under New Hampshire state law without also proving that it was the holder of the borrower’s note. The trial court ruled in favor of BNY Mellon and the plaintiff appealed the case to the First Circuit court, which subsequently certified two questions to the New Hampshire State Supreme Court with regard to whether or not the state law requires that the party initiating the foreclosure must be the owner of both the note and the mortgage at the time the non-judicial foreclosure is brought about.

The Supreme Court referred the First Circuit Court to its opinion in Bergeron v. N.Y. Community Bank, issued in July 2015, which involved answering similar questions on the law pertaining to foreclosure. Both cases involved mortgages creating an agency relationship between MERS and the noteholder and granted expressly to MERS (or whomever MERS assigns) “the power of sale and the right to foreclose and sell the mortgaged property,” according to the announcement.

“We are pleased that the Supreme Court of New Hampshire consistently recognizes the plain language in the mortgage agreement signed by a borrower at closing establishes the lawful agency relationship between MERS and a lender and its successors,” MERSCORP Holdings Vice President for Corporate Communications Janis Smith said. “The New Hampshire Supreme Court ruling recognizes MERS’ authority to take action on behalf of the lender, including assigning the mortgage.”

MERS won a number of court decisions just since the second half of 2015 in cases that challenged its right to act as mortgagee. In late September, MERS won similar decisions in Montana, Georgia, New York, and Texas. In Kentucky in early September 2015, the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals denied an en banc rehearing of a case that held that recording statutes in the state do not required a recording in the land records when promissory notes are transferred. MERS has also had court victories in North Texas, Tennessee, and Pennsylvania since July.

About Author: Brian Honea

Brian Honea
Brian Honea's writing and editing career spans nearly two decades across many forms of media. He served as sports editor for two suburban newspaper chains in the DFW area and has freelanced for such publications as the Yahoo! Contributor Network, Dallas Home Improvement magazine, and the Dallas Morning News. He has written four non-fiction sports books, the latest of which, The Life of Coach Chuck Curtis, was published by the TCU Press in December 2014. A lifelong Texan, Brian received his master's degree from Amberton University in Garland.

34 comments

  1. Pingback: MERS Emerges Triumphant - Appraisal Buzz

  2. Pingback: MERS Emerges Triumphant - Brokers TitleBrokers Title

  3. Pingback: Foreclosure Lands In Texas | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  4. Pingback: Second Mortgage Foreclosure In Texas | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  5. Pingback: Kentucky Land Foreclosure | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  6. Pingback: State Of Tennessee Foreclosure Process | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  7. Pingback: Foreclosure Owner Of Note Plainiff | Top Real Estate Listings

  8. Pingback: Pennsylvania Foreclosure Case Law | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  9. Pingback: Texas Judicial Foreclosure Laws | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  10. Pingback: Wrongful Foreclosure Texas Elements | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  11. Pingback: Judicial Foreclosure Montana | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  12. Pingback: New Foreclosure Laws In Ga | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  13. Pingback: Wrongful Foreclosure Texas | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  14. Pingback: Mortgage Foreclosure Mers | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  15. Pingback: New Hampshire Foreclosure Laws | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  16. Pingback: Wrongful Foreclosure Cases In Texas | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  17. Pingback: New Foreclosure Laws In Tennessee | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  18. Pingback: Bank Of New York Mellon Foreclosure Contact Number | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  19. Pingback: Power Of Sale Foreclosure Vs. Judicial Foreclosure | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  20. Pingback: Kentucky Foreclosure Statutes | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  21. Pingback: En Foreclosure Language | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  22. Pingback: Wrongful Foreclosure Texas Elements | Commercial Real Estate Listings

  23. Pingback: Kentucky Foreclosure Statute | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  24. Pingback: Foreclosure Laws And Timeframes In Texas | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  25. Pingback: Kentucky Foreclosure Law | Selling Your House

  26. Pingback: Foreclosure Sale And Rescission And Wrongful And Texas | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  27. Pingback: Unlawful Foreclosure | Short Sale Houses

  28. Pingback: Non Judicial Foreclosure New York | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  29. Pingback: Georgia Wrongful Foreclosure | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  30. Pingback: Foreclosure Laws In Kentucky | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  31. Pingback: Non Judicial Foreclosure Tennessee | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  32. Pingback: Non Judicial Foreclosure New Hampshire | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  33. Pingback: Non-judicial Foreclosure In Montana | Rates for CPA Services for SMB

  34. Pingback: where to buy social signals

Leave a Reply

Scroll To Top