Home / News / Foreclosure / GAO: Foreclosure Mitigation Efforts Need Improvement
Print This Post Print This Post

GAO: Foreclosure Mitigation Efforts Need Improvement

Outreach programs designed to help struggling borrowers just aren't doing enough to mitigate foreclosure, the ""U.S. Government Accountability Office"":http://gao.gov/ (GAO) said in a ""report"":http://gao.gov/assets/600/592028.pdf Thursday.

[IMAGE]

With high foreclosure rates still presenting a major hurdle to housing and economic recovery, GAO conducted a study to evaluate and find opportunities to enhance foreclosure mitigation efforts. The report asserts that government agencies participating in foreclosure mitigation programs need improve their existing strategies to help borrowers.

The report specifically addressed loans modified by the Treasury (through ""HAMP"":https://www.hmpadmin.com//portal/programs/fha_hamp.jsp), the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), FHA, and the GSEs. Although nearly 2 million loans were modified by those agencies, the number of loans in foreclosure remains elevated, and signs still suggest a weak housing market. GAO's analysis of mortgage data showed that in June 2011, between 1.9 and 3 million loans still had ""characteristics associated with an increased likelihood of foreclosure, such as serious delinquency and significant negative equity (a loan-to-value ratio of 125 percent or greater).""

""These loans were concentrated in certain states, such as Nevada and Florida. Further, more recent indicators such as strong home prices and home equity remain near their post-bubble lows. As of December 2011, total household mortgage debt was $3.7 trillion greater than households' equity in their homes-representing a significant decline in household wealth nationwide,"" said the report.

Furthermore, a large number of borrowers that sought assistance were unable to receive a modification. Approximately 2.8 million borrowers had their HAMP loan modification application denied or their trial loan modification canceled, and the volume of federal modifications has declined since 2010. Although recent efforts have expanded refinancing programs, low participation rates in FHA's program ""raise questions about the need for Treasury's financial support,"" which could go up to $117 million. GAO recommended that funding for the underused program should be reevaluated.

While most agencies and enterprises (excepting the USDA) had stepped up efforts to monitor servicers' outreach to struggling borrowers, not all of them were conducting analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of their foreclosure mitigation efforts. GAO suggested that better data collection and analysis on various factors (such as the size of payment change, delinquency status, and current loan-to-value ratio) could influence the success of foreclosure mitigation actions. These changes could also cut program costs, the report said.

The study also suggested that principal forgiveness could help some homeowners stay in their homes, particularly owners with significant negative equity. However, the agencies and enterprises were not using it consistently, and some were not convinced of the idea's merits.
""The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), for instance, has not allowed the enterprises to offer principal forgiveness. Treasury recently offered to pay incentives to the enterprises to forgive principal, and FHFA is reevaluating its position,"" said the report.

While GAO supplied specific suggestions for various agencies and enterprises to improve their foreclosure mitigation activities, the report largely called for better analysis of loan data to find the most effective solutions.

""Until agencies and the enterprises analyze data that will help them choose the most effective tools and fully utilize those that have proved effective, foreclosure mitigation programs cannot provide the optimal assistance to struggling homeowners or help curtail the costs of the foreclosure crisis to taxpayers,"" said the report.

x

Check Also

Real Estate Investor Activity Down in Q4

Investor market shares fell relative to the previous year from February to August 2023, but increased year-over-year by the end of Q3. However, how do these numbers fit into the big picture?